Alamy again – Act Now!

To: All NUJ Photographers

From: The NUJ Photographers’ Council

Alamy Image Library – Changes to terms and conditions.

As many members will be aware,, one of the world’s largest stock image libraries, intends to impose revised terms and conditions on its contributors from 1st April 2015.

NUJ members who license their images through Alamy have expressed a number of concerns about the company’s new contract, and the issues have been widely discussed by members of the Editorial Photographers UK (EPUK) email discussion group.

The Photographers’ Council has sought legal advice on the validity and enforceability of Alamy’s new terms, and the NUJ is seeking an urgent meeting with the company to discuss our misgivings.

The main points of concern are that Alamy’s new terms would effectively prevent contributors from enforcing their intellectual property rights against infringers who have used images downloaded directly, or indirectly from the Alamy servers, without payment. Crucially, the new Alamy terms appear to prohibit a photographer from contacting an infringer, even after he or she may have terminated their agreement with Alamy, and removed their images.

Additionally, the new terms appear to give Alamy the right to licence a re-use of any image, even if a photographer terminates his or her contract with the company, if, in Alamy’s ‘reasonable opinion’ the new use is ‘the same or closely similar’ to the original use. Effectively, this suggests that under the new contract, once an image has been licensed through Alamy, its creator can never again claim full control over future usage.

A detailed critique of the new Alamy terms can be found on the EPUK website at…/an-open-letter-from-epuk-to-alamy…

Alamy’s response can be seen at…/alamy-responds-to-epuk-s-open-letter

NUJ member David Hoffman, a longstanding Alamy contributor, and one of EPUK’s moderators, has offered his own critique of Alamy’s response at…/alamy-s-defence-misleading-and… .

What can members do, if they are unhappy with the new terms?

The simple answer, is to terminate their agreements with Alamy, by 31st March 2015, and delete all images from the Alamy servers.

This is a serious step to take, not least because Alamy has, in the past, been a good source of income for so many NUJ photographers.

One suggestion that members may wish to consider, is to terminate their existing Alamy contract by 31st March, to maintain control over their existing body of work, but then to rejoin Alamy, under the new terms, but withholding their best selling and most precious images, and placing these with another agency offering more favourable and equitable terms.

A helpful guide on how to preserve metadata and key wording for images that you are removing from Alamy can be found, again from the EPUK website, at

At the very least, members who are currently Alamy contributors should read and digest the information on the EPUK website, and be aware that if they are unhappy with the new terms, they should act before the 31st March deadline.

If the Photographers’ Council gets any more information before 31st March, updates will be posted on the Union Photographers and Videographers Facebook Group, and on the Council’s blog at


Alamy and its new contract changes

The Photographers’ Council of the National Union of Journalists has received reports from members expressing dismay at the proposed changes in contract that the UK Photographic portal ‘Alamy’ (Over 50 million high quality stock images, vectors and videos from Alamy, the world’s largest stock photo collection.) is going to impose upon its contributors, many of whom are NUJ members, in April.

The new contract appears to give Alamy wide ranging rights over images even when a photographer has removed all images from the portal (for example). In most of the many changes it appears that almost exclusively the changes are to Alamy’s specific benefit, some to the positive detriment of the creator. NUJ members tell us they have protested to Alamy and asked for the Union to do the same on their behalf.

The council can only echo the dismay of NUJ members that such a well-known photographic aggregator that relies on creators for its very lifeblood of content, should wish to penalise its suppliers.

The editorial photographers’ forum ‘Editorial Photographers UK’ has made a comprehensive in depth analysis of the proposed changes

Alamy have made a detailed response to this analysis which can also be seen and EPUK have made a number of sensible suggestions. We believe that these are required reading for every supplier of the Alamy Portal.

The NUJ represents members who contribute their own work to the portal, and we ask that Alamy listen to the concerns being raised by creators and sit down and negotiate reasonable solutions with agreed representatives of creators before imposing any contract changes.

Posted on behalf of the NUJ Photographers Council

Battling for Photographers, deeply embedded within the NUJ – a guest blog from John Rogers, Chair of the NUJ’s London Photographers’ Branch

LPB Chairmans report to branch.

Chairman’s report to Branch AGM January 2015

I decided to take on the role as branch chairman of the LPB as a result of the declining factors in our industry, and wanted to understand photographers’ problems and work to improving as much as possible through the NUJ

There has been a declining number of staff photographers on both, regional and national publications. Lots of photographers have left the NUJ and the LPB branch for various reasons, but the reason that is of most concern was the offering of a training programme run by the NUJ to teach writers to use mobile devices for photography. Although this was not intended to undermine the professionalism of working press photographers the actuality was that it did and we now see the likes of the Press Association and many regional news publishers making photographers redundant with Journalists being asked to do their jobs.

This branch is committed to re-establishing the differentiation between press photographers and writers for the sake of professionalism on both sides, and will seek the commitment and support of the leadership in doing so.

There has been a massive increase in ‘Citizen journalism and photography’ the result being an increase in membership applications into the branch, while this may be good for the union and its finances, there is dubious proof on many applications for full membership. Also with the issuing of UKPCA cards based on that membership there are resulting problems in the activity of untrained and inexperienced operators for the profession.

Their needs to be an increase in training for photographers to fully understand the law concerning photography, your rights as a press photographer and limitations regarding privacy, legality, public interest and confrontational aspects when dealing with police. The rights and wrongs of what you can do and can’t do.
The professional way of confronting any wrong doing by a police officer.

There have been problems in the past I have no doubt in the future too and every time we face an increase in problems with policing when doing our jobs it is right to pursue them collectively in a professional manner and try and orchestrate change in the way they deal with the media.

This branch is actively involved with meeting with Metropolitan police officers and its bureaus’ to improve relations and working conditions when dealing with photographers holding a UKPCA press card.

Branch meetings could be better attended, and it has been noted that some new applicants don’t even bother to attend when applying to join the branch this has to be questioned reasons understood and dealt with. The branch is for your use, education, social gathering and problem solving. If you don’t bother we can’t bother. If you want to make changes get involved.

The committee has survived another year but we need help and more people to involve themselves with the branch and will be asking for people to step forward and help at the AGM

John Rogers
Chairman LPB 2014/15